On Wednesday 15 April 2009 07:20:53 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:11:00PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >
> > +                   case -EBADMSG:
> > +                           if (template[i].novrfy)
> > +                                   /* verification failure was expected */
> > +                                   goto next_aead_vector;
> >                             /* fall through */
> 
> We should also fail if novrfy is true and we get a 0 return value.

Oh, yeah, whoops, missed that case. Will add that.

> I'd also prefer to have the novrfy infrastructure changes to go
> into a separate patch.

Yeah, wasn't sure if I should do infra separate or not. I'll split
things up a bit for the next submission that includes the catch for
novrfy true, ret 0.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to