On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:23:35PM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > There is no reason to keep the IV in the private structre. > This also remove a few memcpy()s > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Siewior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks Sebastian. How about just change op->iv to a pointer and assigning walk->iv to it? That should make a smaller patch. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
