On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:13:46PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 06:49:08PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > Can we maybe define working but IV-ignoring functions for ECB (like I > > did), but use memory-clearing nocrypt*() for CFB and CTR (as long as > > these are not supported)? Of course, all of these will return -ENOSYS. > > I thought we would not have to protect users from shooting themselves in > the foot (right now they get an oops). But I agree that the cost of > protecting them is close to zero so we probably should do it. If Herbert > is OK, do you care to provide a new patch ?
Yes, if the above proposal is OK with Herbert, I will provide a new patch for 2.4. Thanks, Alexander - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
