On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:37:42AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > We don't. I think update functions do not need an aligned buffer for > data which is smaller then the alignment size.
You're right. If we do ever get any hardware that requires this we can always change it later on. Another thing, could you pleas change the stack allocation in final so that it does it like cbc_process_decrypt? The reason is that gcc is too stupid to not allocate that buffer unconditionally. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
