On Monday, June 7, 2021 1:42:49 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 2021-06-07 11:32, Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello, > > > > While patching up the event normalizer, I run across these events which > > really have no useful information: > > > > type=BPF msg=audit(1622913714.840:15017): prog-id=137 op=UNLOAD > > > > type=TIME_INJOFFSET msg=audit(1622547739.500:4): sec=0 nsec=486383948 > > Fedora? "-a task,never"?
Nope. It is event #4. Does this even need to be sent? A TIME_INJOFFSET with no supporting info is not helpful. > I assume ghak120 should be present in what you are using by now (v5.11)? 5.12.8 > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/120 > "BUG: accompanying records missing for requried records when no rules > present" There is no syscall anywhere near this: type=SERVICE_STOP msg=audit(06/06/2021 08:44:53.922:973) : pid=1 uid=root auid=unset ses=unset subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd- hostnamed comm=systemd exe=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' ---- type=NETFILTER_CFG msg=audit(06/06/2021 08:44:53.947:974) : table=nat family=bridge entries=0 op=xt_unregister pid=5833 subj=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 comm=kworker/u16:3 ---- type=NETFILTER_CFG msg=audit(06/06/2021 08:44:53.947:975) : table=broute family=bridge entries=0 op=xt_unregister pid=5833 subj=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 comm=kworker/u16:3 ---- type=NETFILTER_CFG msg=audit(06/06/2021 08:44:53.947:976) : table=filter family=bridge entries=0 op=xt_unregister pid=5833 subj=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 comm=kworker/u16:3 > > type=NETFILTER_CFG msg=audit(06/06/2021 08:44:53.947:976) : table=filter > > family=bridge entries=0 op=xt_unregister pid=5833 > > subj=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 comm=kworker/u16:3 > This is as complete as this event is going to get. It is a kernel > event, reaping an unused table after a timeout. See > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/25 auid=-1 ses=-1 was it successful? Was the BPF event succesful? Is there the equivalent of a task struct for BPF programs that tells anything about who it belonged to? -Steve > > Either their syscall record is missing or they simply do not have all the > > necessary information. (Subject, action, object, results) > > > > -Steve > > - RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
