On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:00:08 +0200, Patrick Shirkey wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 19:58 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: >>> That's pretty cool IMHO and I wish more companies would do that! >>> >>> Also coming up with a protocol is the easier part. Documenting it, >>> pushing it out to users, gaining traction in the industry etc is the >>> hard part. >> >> The whole point of such a protocol as they've developed it is to >> increase creativity and to open up possibilities for collaboration >> and new musical ideas. Isn't that one of the reasons we like to >> hangout on mailing lists like this one? > >Some us us disagree that this IS the "whole point" of Link.
>From my user point of view I welcome Linux apps integrating Ableton Link. Actually I don't know if I really need it, but it doesn't harm to have the opportunity to use it. Some subscribers explained that it's not just another way to sync by one master and several slaves. I've got a question. If I e.g. have one device at 180 BPM and another at 90 BPM, they both could keep the their own tempo and would play in sync? This double/half speed thing is a common MIDI sync issue. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
