Turn off that camera during virtual meetings, environmental study says

Date: January 14, 2021
Source: Purdue University

Summary:

A new study says that despite a record drop in global carbon emissions in 2020, 
a pandemic-driven shift to remote work and more at-home entertainment still 
presents significant environmental impact due to how internet data is stored 
and transferred around the world.

FULL STORY:

It's not just to hide clutter anymore -- add "saving the planet" to the reasons 
you leave the camera off during your next virtual meeting.

A new study says that despite a record drop in global carbon emissions in 2020, 
a pandemic-driven shift to remote work and more at-home entertainment still 
presents significant environmental impact due to how internet data is stored 
and transferred around the world.

Just one hour of videoconferencing or streaming, for example, emits 150-1,000 
grams of carbon dioxide (a gallon of gasoline burned from a car emits about 
8,887 grams), requires 2-12 liters of water and demands a land area adding up 
to about the size of an iPad Mini.

But leaving your camera off during a web call can reduce these footprints by 
96%. Streaming content in standard definition rather than in high definition 
while using apps such as Netflix or Hulu also could bring an 86% reduction, the 
researchers estimated.

The study, conducted by researchers from Purdue University, Yale University and 
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is the first to analyze the water 
and land footprints associated with internet infrastructure in addition to 
carbon footprints. The findings are published in the journal Resources, 
Conservation & Recycling.

"If you just focus on one type of footprint, you miss out on others that can 
provide a more holistic look at environmental impact," said Roshanak "Roshi" 
Nateghi, a Purdue professor of industrial engineering, whose work looks to 
uncover gaps and assumptions in energy research that have led to 
underestimating the effects of climate change.

A number of countries have reported at least a 20% increase in internet traffic 
since March. If the trend continues through the end of 2021, this increased 
internet use alone would require a forest of about 71,600 square miles -- twice 
the land area of Indiana -- to sequester the emitted carbon, the study found.

The additional water needed in the processing and transmission of data would 
also be enough to fill more than 300,000 Olympic-size swimming pools, while the 
resulting land footprint would be about equal to the size of Los Angeles.

The team estimated the carbon, water and land footprints associated with each 
gigabyte of data used in YouTube, Zoom, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok 
and 12 other platforms, as well as in online gaming and miscellaneous web 
surfing. As expected, the more video used in an application, the larger the 
footprints.

Because data processing uses a lot of electricity, and any production of 
electricity has carbon, water and land footprints, reducing data download 
reduces environmental damage.

"Banking systems tell you the positive environmental impact of going paperless, 
but no one tells you the benefit of turning off your camera or reducing your 
streaming quality. So without your consent, these platforms are increasing your 
environmental footprint," said Kaveh Madani, who led and directed this study as 
a visiting fellow at the Yale MacMillan Center.

The internet's carbon footprint had already been increasing before COVID-19 
lockdowns, accounting for about 3.7% of global greenhouse gas emissions. But 
the water and land footprints of internet infrastructure have largely been 
overlooked in studies of how internet use impacts the environment, Madani said.

Madani teamed up with Nateghi's research group to investigate these footprints 
and how they might be affected by increased internet traffic, finding that the 
footprints not only vary by web platform, but also by the country. The team 
gathered data for Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Iran, Japan, Mexico, 
Pakistan, Russia, South Africa, the U.K. and the U.S.

Processing and transmitting internet data in the U.S., the researchers found, 
has a carbon footprint that is 9% higher than the world median, but water and 
land footprints that are 45% and 58% lower, respectively.

Incorporating the water and land footprints of internet infrastructure painted 
a surprising picture for a few countries. Even though Germany, a world 
renewable energy leader, has a carbon footprint well below the world median, 
its water and land footprints are much higher. The country's energy production 
land footprint, for example, is 204% above the median, the researchers 
calculated.

Purdue graduate students Renee Obringer, Benjamin Rachunok and Debora 
Maia-Silva performed the calculations and data analysis in collaboration with 
Maryam Arbabzadeh, a postdoctoral research associate at MIT. The estimates are 
based on publicly available data for each platform and country, models 
developed by Madani's research group and known values of energy use per 
gigabyte of fixed-line internet use.

The estimates are rough, the researchers say, since they're only as good as the 
data made available by service providers and third parties. But the team 
believes that the estimates still help to document a trend and bring a more 
comprehensive understanding of environmental footprints associated with 
internet use.

"These are the best estimates given the available data. In view of these 
reported surges, there is a hope now for higher transparency to guide policy," 
Nateghi said.


The study was supported by the Purdue Climate Change Research Center, the 
Purdue Center for the Environment, the MIT Energy Initiative and the Yale 
MacMillan Center.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Purdue University. Original written by Kayla Wiles.

Journal Reference:

Renee Obringer, Benjamin Rachunok, Debora Maia-Silva, Maryam Arbabzadeh, 
Roshanak Nateghi, Kaveh Madani. The overlooked environmental footprint of 
increasing Internet use. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021; 167: 
105389 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105389

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to