https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03324-y
NEWS  24 NOVEMBER 2020  By Holly Else

Nature journals reveal terms of landmark open-access option

The journals will charge authors up to €9,500 to make research papers free to 
read, in a long-awaited alternative to subscription-only publishing.

Publisher Springer Nature has announced how scientists can make their papers in 
its most selective titles free to read as soon as they are published — part of 
a long-awaited move to offer open-access publishing in the Nature family of 
journals.

>From 2021, the publisher will charge €9,500, US$11,390 or £8,290 to make a 
>paper open access (OA) in Nature and 32 other journals that currently keep 
>most of their articles behind paywalls and are financed by subscriptions.

It is also trialling a scheme that would halve that price for some journals, 
under a common-review system that might guide papers to a number of titles.

OA advocates are pleased that the publisher has found ways to offer open access 
to all authors, which it first committed to in April. But they are concerned 
about the price.

The development is a “very significant” moment in the movement to make 
scientific articles free for all to read, but “it looks very expensive”, says 
Stephen Curry, a structural biologist at Imperial College London.

The change was spurred by the ‘Plan S’ movement, in which funders are mandating 
that their grant recipients must make their work OA as soon as it is published; 
the funders will generally cover researchers’ costs for this in journals that 
meet their requirements.

Last month, Springer Nature signed a deal that allowed some German scientists 
to publish openly in Nature-branded journals for free, with a 
€9,500-per-article price baked into their institutions’ subscription fees.

But today’s announcement reveals the options for any author who wants to 
publish OA. (Nature is editorially independent of its publisher.)

Publishers of extremely selective journals, such as Nature and Science, have 
been trying to work out how to switch from subscriptions to OA since Plan S was 
announced. A large proportion of their production costs come from evaluating 
manuscripts that are ultimately rejected; when revenue can be collected only 
from the few articles that get published, the fee per article is high.

High price

No other journals charge as much as €9,500 per OA paper: the highest fees 
elsewhere are less than $6,000 (about €5,000). Some OA advocates criticize 
Springer Nature’s fee as too high.

Peter Suber, director of the Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication in 
Cambridge, Massachusetts, says it is a “prestige tax”, because it will pay for 
the journals’ high rejection rates, but will not, in his opinion, guarantee 
higher quality or discoverability. “I think it would be absurd for any funder, 
university or author to pay it,” he says.

But Lisa Hinchliffe, a librarian at the University of Illinois at 
Urbana–Champaign, says that the fees are not necessarily too high for authors. 
“I think many authors will find this to be an acceptable price for value,” she 
says.

Juan Pablo Alperin, a communications scholar at Simon Fraser University in 
Vancouver, Canada, says that although the announcement “signals that universal 
open access is inevitable”, the costs are out of reach for researchers in 
poorer countries.

A Springer Nature spokesperson responds that costs are higher than at other 
titles because Nature-branded journals review many more papers than are 
published, and because they employ in-house editors and press officers, whose 
work is of “huge value” to researchers. “Making comparisons is difficult, as no 
other highly selective journal portfolio is offering OA on this scale,” they 
say.

Authors who don’t choose OA can continue to freely publish their research 
behind a paywall, the spokesperson notes: these papers are available to 
subscribers, and authors can make their accepted manuscripts available online 
after a delay; for Nature, that is six months after publication.

The group of funders backing Plan S, called cOAlition S, says publishers should 
provide data to break down how publishing fees relate to the services provided. 
“Once this information is available, the research community will be better 
placed to decide whether the fees levied by publishers are fair and 
reasonable,” says coalition coordinator Robert Kiley, who is also head of open 
research at the biomedical-research funder Wellcome in London.

‘Guided’ OA pilot

Springer Nature is also introducing a scheme that would roughly halve OA fees 
for some journals, which it is trialling with Nature Physics, Nature Genetics 
and Nature Methods. Under the scheme, called guided OA, authors submit 
manuscripts and — if they pass a suitability screen — pay a non-refundable fee 
of €2,190 to cover an editorial assessment and the peer-review process. In 
return, they get a review document, which the publisher says includes more 
detailed editorial evaluation than typical review reports, and they are told 
which Springer Nature title their work is recommended for.

Authors who submit to Nature Physics, for instance, might be accepted at that 
journal or told what revisions they need to make to reach it; they might be 
guided to the less-selective journals Nature Communications or Communications 
Physics; or their manuscript might be rejected. They can then walk away with 
their report or, if accepted, can pay a top-up fee of €2,600 to publish in 
Nature Physics or Nature Communications. The total fee of €4,790 is half the 
standard OA fee for Nature Physics, and a slight increase on the price of 
publishing in Nature Communications, the only Nature-branded title that is 
already fully OA. The top-up fee is €800 for Communications Physics, again 
making the total cost a slight increase on the current price in that OA 
journal; the increase is to cover the extra editorial work involved in the 
guided OA route compared with direct submissions to these journals, the 
publisher says.

This mechanism “shares the cost more evenly over multiple authors” and will 
save time by avoiding multiple rounds of review in different journals, says 
James Butcher, vice-president of journals at the Nature Portfolio and BMC, an 
imprint owned by Springer Nature. Hinchliffe sees it as “a creative experiment 
for authors and publisher to manage financial risk”.

The scheme could be tempting to researchers hoping to publish in a 
Nature-branded journal, says Alperin. Compared with the full-price OA option, 
it “offers a lower initial barrier of entry with a higher threshold of 
success”, he says. But peer reviewers who have appraised the manuscript under 
this scheme might feel that Nature titles are “essentially selling their free 
labour to authors” if a reviewed paper is not eventually published, says Curry.

Test run

Kiley will watch the idea with interest. “Ultimately, we believe that 
publishing costs need to be split so that they reflect the different services 
publishers provide, and this experiment by [Springer Nature] will help inform 
this approach,” he says.

Journals in the Nature family have committed to increasing their OA content 
over time, so most Plan S funders have said they will pay their OA fees, 
despite a general reluctance to support hybrid journals (which keep some papers 
behind a paywall and make others open). But some, including the European 
Commission and the Dutch Research Council (NWO), have not yet agreed to this.

Other publishers of highly-selective journals haven’t yet announced policies in 
response to Plan S. Cell Press (owned by Elsevier in Amsterdam) says that the 
journal Cell is finalizing its approach: it currently offers OA publishing at 
$5,900, but only to authors whose funding agency “has an appropriate agreement” 
with the journal. That policy doesn’t suit Plan S, Kiley says.

The publisher of Science-branded journals, the American Association for the 
Advancement of Science in Washington DC, says it is still thinking about how to 
adjust to Plan S. Since 2013, it has allowed authors to post an accepted 
version of their article in an online repository when their paper is published. 
But that doesn’t satisfy Plan S funders, who ask that manuscripts be shared 
under an open licence that allows anyone else to redistribute or adapt the 
work. Science’s policy does not currently permit this.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03324-y

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to