On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 10:47 +1000, JLWhitaker wrote: > Exactly. I replied to the friend who sent the link to me that relying > on voice input is nuts.
It is now. That doesn't mean it can never be. We should not discard a technology because it is rough now. But likewise we shouldn't trust it while it is still rough - or rather we should know its limits and use it within them. > I can't imagine thought commands being better fidelity. You know better than to use the argument from personal incredulity :-) Thought commands literally direct everything we do. Already. They put one foot in front of the other, they decide which words to say, they decide which key to press. > What thought is going to input? Hey, your ass looks REALLY fat in > that! How come your mouth doesn't do that? Because you direct it, with your thoughts, to output the correct, desired statements. It's just an output peripheral for your thinking, used when you choose to use it and clamped shut when you don't. So we have working, billion-year-old actual proof that thought control works just fine :-) Regards, K. PS: Please assume all the bad jokes about mistyping, Trumpian tweets and spoken gaffes and tripping over one's own feet have been duly made. They don't change the argument. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([email protected]) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer http://twitter.com/kauer389 GPG fingerprint: 8D08 9CAA 649A AFEF E862 062A 2E97 42D4 A2A0 616D Old fingerprint: A0CD 28F0 10BE FC21 C57C 67C1 19A6 83A4 9B0B 1D75 _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
