On 31/07/2016 8:13 PM, David Boxall wrote: > On 31/07/2016 9:55 AM, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote: >> On 30/07/2016 11:59 PM, Stephen Loosley quoted: >>> The best way to understand the test is to see a few samples in >>> action. Take this question: >>> >> >> People will never get used to AI systems because they are just too >> stupid. >>
To be clear, but I was posting an ambiguous sentence to add to the sample. > Indeed. I've known many people who lacked common sense. Can we really > have artificial intelligence if we don't have the other kind? > > Machine learning seems to be conflated with artificial intelligence. > Are the two terms synonymous? Does a learning system really need > intelligence? IMHO, machine learning is purely a matter of data analysis and "curve" fitting. A somewhat more advanced version of regression analysis. Human learning and intelligence is a combination of the construction of mental models and parameter estimation. Machine learning is mostly (if not entirely) parameter estimation. -- Regards brd Bernard Robertson-Dunn Sydney Australia email: [email protected] web: www.drbrd.com web: www.problemsfirst.com Blog: www.problemsfirst.com/blog _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
