At 10:52 AM 12/09/2013, Roger Clarke wrote: > >and other organizations on-line, they are more likely to be receptive to > >eGovernment. > >So the intensity of [5] may be (unjustifiably) decreased, although by >how much, and with what further impacts, is hard to judge.
I think there is a bit of expectation, though, that many govt services would be at least as advanced as other govts around the world. I do hope, however, that they don't go as far as the US in that some services are only online but since I don't live in the US, I can't get an account on them. I'm sorta stuck as to how to deal with this. >But it doesn't address the major impediments, which are [1] to [4]. Agreed. We're back to business case again, and that requires realistic pragmatists who can analyse the whole set of processes, not just the whim of the politician who happens to sit in the seat at the moment, particularly a merchant banker who thinks he understands IT because he once owned/ran an internet company. Jan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [email protected] Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space. ~Margaret Atwood, writer _ __________________ _ _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
