Hi Mohamed, We had a bit of instability in GDB testing a week ago, and your patch seems to have hit that. It seems testing of your V2 patches was affected.
The only patch that was flagged is [1], and it seems like a false positive. Please disregard the regression report. [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gdb/patch/[email protected]/ Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jun 16, 2026, at 13:33, Bouhaouel, Mohamed via linaro-toolchain > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am reaching out regarding regression emails I received from your CI about > the patch series I submitted recently. > > V1 (submitted on 18.05.2026): > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gdb/cover/[email protected]/ > V2 (submitted on 11.06.2026): > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gdb/cover/[email protected]/ > > The regressions were reported for the V2 series, in which no functional > changes were introduced (only commit message updates). I am wondering if > your CI has been passing for V1 or was not triggered? > > I would appreciate your help in determining whether the reported regressions > are legitimate or false positives. If they are indeed regressions introduced > by my changes, I would greatly appreciate guidance on the reproduction steps. > > Thanks, > --Mohamed > > Intel Deutschland GmbH > > Registered Address: Dornacher Strasse 1, 85622 Feldkirchen, Germany > Tel: +49 89 991 430, www.intel.de > Managing Directors: Harry Demas, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Yin Chong Sorrell > Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau > Registered Seat: Munich > Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928 > _______________________________________________ > linaro-toolchain mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
