On Fri, 21 Nov 2025, [email protected] wrote:

> Dear contributor,
> 
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find 
> some details below.
> 
> In  master-aarch64, after:
>   | commit glibc-2.42.9000-537-gcd748a63ab1
>   | Author: Joseph Myers <[email protected]>
>   | Date:   Thu Nov 20 19:30:27 2025 +0000
>   | 
>   |     Implement C23 const-preserving standard library macros
>   |     
>   |     C23 makes various standard library functions, that return a pointer
>   |     into an input array, into macros that return a pointer to const when
>   |     the relevant argument passed to the macro is a pointer to const.  (The
>   | ... 35 lines of the commit log omitted.
> 
> Produces 5 regressions:
>   | 
>   | regressions.sum:
>   | Running gcc:gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ...
>   | FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/strchr-1.c (test for warnings, line 32)
>   | FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/strchr-1.c (test for warnings, line 39)
>   | FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/strchr-1.c (test for excess errors)
>   | FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/strchr-1.c event at line 33 (test for warnings, 
> line 32)

I'm not sure why this test is using the strchr declaration from <string.h> 
as well as __builtin_strchr, but depending on the goals of doing so, the 
options to fix this are either making the test const-correct so it works 
with the C23 macro, or suppressing macro expansion.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to