On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 4:27 AM Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauerm...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hello H.J., > > "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 10:39 PM <ci_not...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> Dear contributor, > >> > >> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > >> find some > >> details below. > >> > >> In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after: > >> | commit gcc-16-1041-g2da641d0170 > >> | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> > >> | Date: Sun Jun 1 09:29:48 2025 +0800 > >> | > >> | Move get_call_rtx_from to final.c > >> | > >> | Move get_call_rtx_from to final.c and call call_from_call_insn. > >> | > >> | PR other/120493 > >> | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > >> > >> Produces 5105 regressions: > >> | > >> | regressions.sum: > >> | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse.exp ... > >> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/cmse/baseline/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset > >> | -march=armv8-m.base -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -O0 scan-assembler > >> ands\tr0, r4 > >> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/cmse/baseline/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset > >> | -march=armv8-m.base -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -O0 scan-assembler > >> ands\tr1, r4 > >> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/cmse/baseline/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset > >> | -march=armv8-m.base -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -O0 scan-assembler > >> ands\tr2, r4 > >> | UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/cmse/baseline/bitfield-4.c -mcpu=unset > >> | -march=armv8-m.base -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft -O0 scan-assembler > >> | bl\t__gnu_cmse_nonsecure_call > >> | ... and 5101 more > >> > >> Used configuration : > >> *CI config* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb > >> -march=armv8-m.main+dsp+fp > >> -mtune=cortex-m33 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=auto > >> *configure and test flags:* --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib > >> --with-mode=thumb > >> --with-cpu=cortex-m33 --with-float=hard > >> --target_board=-mthumb/-march=armv8-m.main+dsp+fp/-mtune=cortex-m33/-mfloat-abi=hard/-mfpu=auto > >> qemu-cpu=cortex-m33 > > > > Please try this. > > I'll be glad to try a patch. > > Should there be a patch attached to this email? I don't see it. >
A patch was submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/685684.html But Richard suggested that arm backend should be changed: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/685733.html -- H.J. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
