Hi Stefan,

We are seeing some issues on our side that it indicates some buildbot
misconfiguration.  I think you can ignore this for now, sorry for the
noise.

On 02/05/25 11:19, Stefan Liebler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> For this V2-patch, I got the same "Operation not permitted" errors as
> for the V1 one:
> https://lists.linaro.org/archives/list/linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org/thread/2EHTRTCZHLDJZXZ46MLNTNVGZNPKX6UY/
> 
> @Adhemerval: have you had a look?
> The only non-s390x changes of my patch are in:
> elf/Makefile
> elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache.script
> => There the libmarkermod6 libraries are added.
> 
> As I don't have an arm, I've checked on x86_64, that the testcase
> elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache.c contains the libmarkermod6.so files in
> glibc-hwcaps/z13-z17 directories by adding a "ldconfig -p" to the test.
> 
> Any idea why those "Operation not permitted" regressions hits my patch,
> but no others?
> 
> Bye,
> Stefan
> 
> On 4/30/25 20:19, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>> Dear contributor,
>>
>> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please 
>> find some details below.
>>
>> In glibc_check master-arm, after:
>>   | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/111247
>>   | Author: Stefan Liebler <s...@linux.ibm.com>
>>   | Date:   Tue Apr 29 13:28:58 2025 +0200
>>   | 
>>   |     [PATCH v2] S390: Add new s390 platform z17.
>>   |     
>>   |     Hi,
>>   |     need a V2: stfle_bits on stack in init_cpu_features_no_tunables() 
>> needs to be
>>   |     zeroed before usage.  If there is no more feedback, I will commit 
>> this patch shortly.
>>   | ... 41 lines of the commit log omitted.
>>   | ... applied on top of baseline commit:
>>   | 84977600dac math: Fix UB on sinpif (BZ 32925)
>>
>> Produces 90 regressions:
>>   | 
>>   | regressions.sum:
>>   | Running glibc:debug ...
>>   | FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-syslog 
>>   | Running glibc:dirent ...
>>   | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-long 
>>   | FAIL: dirent/tst-readdir-zero-inode 
>>   | ... and 99 more
>>
>> Used configuration :
>>  *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm
>>  *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on 
>> armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
>>
>> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
>> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>>
>> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>>
>> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to 
>> reproduce a debug environment:
>>
>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
>>  * 
>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/
>> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make 
>> commands are in
>>  * 
>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/
>> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
>>  * 
>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>>
>> Current build   : 
>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/3574/artifact/artifacts
>> Reference build : 
>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/2743/artifact/artifacts
>>
>> Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update
>> generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the
>> master files.
> 

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to