Hi Ricardo,

Test results for the pull request are at [1].  Details on the failed tests are 
at [2].

[1] 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1756/artifact/artifacts/notify/mail-body.txt/*view*/
[2] 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1756/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/llvm-test-suite.1.json.xz/*view*/

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org

> On Mar 15, 2025, at 04:39, Ricardo Jesus <r...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Maxim,
> 
> Thank you very much for your offer, and sorry for the delay getting back
> to you. I was waiting for the PR to be approved.
> 
> The issue was a bug in the LLVM sources which my original PR exposed. It
> should be fixed now.
> 
> The PR is here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130625
> 
> If you could give it a try and let me know if everything works as
> expected, that would be much appreciated. :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Ricardo
> 
> On 3/10/25 23:05, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo,
>> 
>> I can test your PR.  Please send me the link.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --
>> Maxim Kuvyrkov
>> https://www.linaro.org/>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2025, at 21:50, Ricardo Jesus <r...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Maxim,
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much for confirming!
>>> 
>>> I think I was able to identify the problem. I'm planning to open a PR to
>>> reapply the patch with the fix today.
>>> 
>>> I've inspected some of the tests that were failing manually and the new
>>> patch seems to fix them. However, I don't have access to hardware with
>>> SVE 256, so I'm not able to test the whole suite.
>>> 
>>> Is it possible to launch one-off runs of the bot against specific PRs to
>>> confirm that the whole tests pass before merging?
>>> 
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Ricardo
>>> 
>>> On 3/9/25 23:00, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>>> Hi Ricardo,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for looking into this!
>>>> 
>>>> The tests are run on AWS Graviton3 hardware (m7g AWS instance), which 
>>>> seems to match -msve-vector-bits=256.
>>>> 
>>>> Let me know if you need any help in reproducing the failures.
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Maxim Kuvyrkov
>>>> https://www.linaro.org/>>>>> On Mar 8, 2025, at 02:15, Ricardo Jesus 
>>>> <r...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry for this issue, I've reverted this in:
>>>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/21610e3ecc8bc727f99047e544186b35b1291bcd>>>>>
>>>>>  Before I start digging into it further, could you please let me know
>>>>> what hardware is used to run these tests? I just thought I'd
>>>>> double-check that the requested -msve-vector-bits=256 does match the
>>>>> hardware SVE length.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks very much,
>>>>> Ricardo
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/7/25 09:03, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>>>>>> [You don't often get email from ci_not...@linaro.org. Learn why this is 
>>>>>> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear contributor,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please 
>>>>>> find some details below.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
>>>>>> | commit llvmorg-21-init-4020-gf01e760c0836
>>>>>> | Author: Ricardo Jesus <r...@nvidia.com>
>>>>>> | Date:   Thu Mar 6 09:27:07 2025 +0000
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     [AArch64][SVE] Improve fixed-length addressing modes. (#129732)
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based 
>>>>>> offsets
>>>>>> |     with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed
>>>>>> |     addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting 
>>>>>> immediate
>>>>>> | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Produces 6235 regressions:
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> | regressions.sum:
>>>>>> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0000 ...
>>>>>> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0003.test
>>>>>> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0004.test
>>>>>> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0008.test
>>>>>> | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0000/Fujitsu-C-0000_0009.test
>>>>>> | ... and 6513 more
>>>>>> | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output 
>>>>>> of the binary differs from the expected one
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Used configuration :
>>>>>> * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja  ../llvm/llvm 
>>>>>> "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra"    
>>>>>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True        
>>>>>> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install          
>>>>>> "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
>>>>>> * Testsuite : export 
>>>>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
>>>>>> cmake -GNinja  -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang"   
>>>>>>       -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/clang++"     
>>>>>> -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin/flang-new"       
>>>>>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release      -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= 
>>>>>> -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS=      -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math 
>>>>>> -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm 
>>>>>> -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld 
>>>>>> -DNDEBUG"    -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math 
>>>>>> -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm 
>>>>>> -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld 
>>>>>> -DNDEBUG"  -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math 
>>>>>> -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -mllvm 
>>>>>> -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -flto -fuse-ld=lld 
>>>>>> -DNDEBUG"      -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON         
>>>>>> -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu    "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We track this bug report under 
>>>>>> https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1592 Please let us know if you 
>>>>>> have a fix.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on 
>>>>>> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways 
>>>>>> to reproduce a debug environment:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
>>>>>> * 
>>>>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1699/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
>>>>>>  The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and 
>>>>>> make commands are in
>>>>>> * 
>>>>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1699/artifact/artifacts/notify/
>>>>>>  The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
>>>>>> * 
>>>>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1699/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ 
>>>>>> Current build   : 
>>>>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1699/artifact/artifacts
>>>>>>  Reference build : 
>>>>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld-build/1698/artifact/artifacts
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Instruction to reproduce the build : 
>>>>>> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/sha1/f01e760c08365426de95f02dc2c2dc670eb47352/tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld/reproduction_instructions.txt
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Full commit : 
>>>>>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f01e760c08365426de95f02dc2c2dc670eb47352>>>
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to