On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 14:50, Jens Remus <jre...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Hello! > > On 03.04.2025 14:32, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > > find some details below. > > Could you please help me understand what the detected problem(s) are? > The mail subject suggests that everything may actually be fine? >
Hi! Normally we do not send notifications when the regression tests pass (which is the case here). Unfortunately I introduced a typo in a script, and we sent the template notification. Should be fixed soon. Sorry for the inconvenience. Christophe > > In binutils_build master-arm, after: > > | 5 patches in binutils > > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109718 > > | cde90675110 [PATCH 5/8] s390: Represent FP without RA saved in SFrame > > | fa5be46ad1a [PATCH 4/8] s390: Represent FP/RA saved in register in > > SFrame > > | b029a0bbe60 [PATCH 3/8] s390: Initial support to generate .sframe from > > CFI directives in assembler > > | d40f1518ae8 [PATCH 2/8] s390: Explicitly list linker dump tests > > | 45da7966615 [PATCH 1/8] sframe: Ignore section padding when converting > > endianness > > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > > | abf215a338f ld/testsuite/ld-pe: Escape dots in regular expressions > > My series consists of 8 patches. Could it be that they appeared in > Patchworks in a bad order, e.g. due to in what order my company's mail > server delivered them to the list, and this now confuses the CI? > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/binutils/list/?series=45805 > > > Produces Success: > > | Results changed to > > | # reset_artifacts: > > | -10 > > | # true: > > | 0 > > | # build_abe binutils: > > | 1 > > | > > | From > > | # reset_artifacts: > > | -10 > > | # true: > > | 0 > > | # build_abe binutils: > > | 1 > > The results appear to be unchanged to me. > > > Used configuration : > > *CI config* tcwg_binutils_build master-arm > > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on > > armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > > linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to > > reproduce a debug environment: > > > > You can find the failure logs in > > * > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/ > > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > > make commands are in > > * > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > > > > Current build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-precommit/3765/artifact/artifacts > > Reference build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_build--master-arm-build/2375/artifact/artifacts > > > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > > master files. > > Thanks and regards, > Jens > -- > Jens Remus > Linux on Z Development (D3303) > +49-7031-16-1128 Office > jre...@de.ibm.com > > IBM > > IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der Gesellschaft: > Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 > IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/ > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org > To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
