On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 22:07, <ci_not...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find > some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109240 > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> > | Date: Wed Mar 26 17:19:11 2025 +0000 > | > | [PATCH] arm: don't vectorize fmaxf() unless unsafe math opts are > enabled > | > | This test has presumably been failing since vectorization was enabled > | at -O2. I suspect part of the reason this wasn't picked up sooner is > | that the test is a hybrid execution/scan-assembler test and the > | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 876a521a198 OpenMP: Fix declaration in append-args-interop.c test case > > Produces 2 regressions 2 improvements: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times > vmaxnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/vect-fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times > vminnm.f32\tq[0-9]+, q[0-9]+, q[0-9]+ 1 > | > | improvements.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vmaxnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, > s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/fmaxmin.c scan-assembler-times vminnm.f32\ts[0-9]+, > s[0-9]+, s[0-9]+ 1 >
Hi Richard, I suspect the scripts were confused because there were some bugs in dg-directives during a few days, leading to random Tcl errors. You've committed your patch by now anyway, just mentioning in case you are confused. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience, Christophe > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on > armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to > reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make > commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/11651/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3611/artifact/artifacts > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
