Hi, On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 03:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi James, > > Thanks for reaching out! > > [CC: Christophe], would you please look at replacing [broken] links to > testsuite results with links to build logs? See below.
Thanks for the heads-up, this should now be fixed. Christophe > > See comments inline. > > > On Feb 20, 2025, at 13:42, James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I seem to have begun receiving CI/CD patch notifications from > > ci_not...@linaro.org. I don't understand them, and they might be > > premature. I don't want to ignore them, though, if they do matter. > > > > I am supplying a 100,000 line patch, roughly, to add a COBOL front-end to > > gcc. As of now, there is no libgcobol or gcc/cobol directory in the master > > branch. The supplied patch came most recently in 14 "easy pieces". To be > > applied successfully, the patches to the Python scripts that create those > > directories must be applied first. > > > > The URLs at the end of the mail come up 404. I suppose they are ephemeral. > > I haven't been able to look at a complete log to understand the basis of > > the report. > > > > The mail says to ask here, so here I be. Please advise. I'm not subscribed > > to this list. > > > > Thanks, > > > > --jkl > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:10:38 +0000 (UTC) > > From: ci_not...@linaro.org > > To: jklow...@schemamania.org > > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #106762: Failure on aarch64 > > > > > > Dear contributor, > > > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). > > Please find some details below. > > > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/106762 > > Looking at the above patchwork entry, I see that your patch "COBOL v3: 3/14 > 80K bld: config and build machinery" was not detected as part of the series > [1], which means it was applied without the prerequisite 1/14 and 2/14 > patches. That's the reason for the failure. > > [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=44237 > > Looking at your whole submission [2], I see that patchwork sees each patch as > its own series, so our CI will test them individually. I'm, actually, > surprised that only patch 3/14 fails to build -- the rest pass the CI. I > would have expected all but 1/14 to fail. > > [2] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?submitter=37098 > > > | Author: James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org> > > | Date: Tue Feb 18 18:37:13 2025 -0500 > > | > > | [PATCH] COBOL v3: 3/14 80K bld: config and build machinery > > | > > | From f89a50238de62b73d9fc44ee7226461650ab119d Tue 18 Feb 2025 > > 04:19:10 PM EST | From: "James K. Lowden" <jklow...@symas.com> > > | Date: Tue 18 Feb 2025 04:19:10 PM EST > > | ... 27 lines of the commit log omitted. > > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > > | 427386042f0 LoongArch: Use normal RTL pattern instead of UNSPEC for > > {x,}vsr{a,l}ri instructions > > > > Produces Failure: > > | Results changed to > > | # reset_artifacts: > > | -10 > > | # true: > > | 0 > > | # build_abe gcc: > > | # FAILED > > | # First few build errors in logs: > > | # 00:03:17 make[1]: *** [Makefile:4720: all-gcc] Error 2 > > | # 00:03:17 make: *** [Makefile:1063: all] Error 2 > > The build log is at [3]. > > [3] > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/04-build_abe-gcc/ > > Looking at make-gcc-stage2.log.xz I see > === > make[2]: *** No rule to make target > '/home/tcwg-build/workspace/tcwg_gnu_4/abe/snapshots/gcc.git~master/gcc/cobol/cobol1.cc', > needed by 's-gtype'. Stop. > === > > > > > > | > > | From > > | # reset_artifacts: > > | -10 > > | # true: > > | 0 > > | # build_abe gcc: > > | 1 > > > > Used configuration : > > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > > *configure and test flags:* > > > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > > linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the > > ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > > * > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ > > This is a build failure, but we [mistakenly] include a link to the testsuite > results -- we will fix this. > > > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > > make commands are in > > * > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > > This one works. > > > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > > * > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > Similar to the first, this is where testsuite xfails would have been; need to > remove this link. > > > > > Current build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/16368/artifact/artifacts > > Reference build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3164/artifact/artifacts > > > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > > master files. > > _______________________________________________ > > linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org > > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > > > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
