Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> writes: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 12:58, <ci_not...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Dear contributor, >> >> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please >> find some details below. >> >> In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: >> | 4 patches in gcc >> | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/103420 >> | 3a8cf3dce8f [PATCH 4/4] aarch64: Add mf8 data movement intrinsics >> | afa8fb3b8b4 [PATCH 3/4] aarch64: Add missing makefile dependency >> | 7120f3c23db [PATCH 2/4] aarch64: Use mf8 instead of f8 in builtin >> definitions >> | 0cc75ba5a1a [PATCH 1/4] aarch64: Macroise simd_type definitions >> | ... applied on top of baseline commit: >> | b117201385d testsuite: Fix toplevel-asm-1.c failure for riscv >> >> Produces Failure: >> | Results changed to >> | # reset_artifacts: >> | -10 >> | # true: >> | 0 >> | # build_abe gcc: >> | # FAILED >> | >> | From >> | # reset_artifacts: >> | -10 >> | # true: >> | 0 >> | # build_abe gcc: >> | 1 >> > > Hi Richard, > > Since the message is not very clear, your patches break the build. > The log contains these errors: > aarch64-sve2.md: In function ‘insn_code > maybe_code_for_aarch64_cm(rtx_code, machine_mode, int, int)’: > aarch64-sve2.md:7205:12: error: > ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le_vec_concatz_be’ was not > declared in this scope; did you mean > ‘CODE_FOR_aarch64_cmltv8qi_vec_concatz_le’? > (and many other similar entries) > > HTH
Yeah, this is expected. The series relies on a previous one that hasn't been approved yet, see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/672008.html for details. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
