On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 13:59, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 is
> -----------
> ! { dg-do compile }
> ! { dg-options "-Os" }
>
> program test
> use iso_c_binding, only: c_short
> interface
> subroutine foo(a) bind(c)
> import c_short
> integer(kind=c_short), intent(in), value :: a
> end subroutine foo
> end interface
> integer(kind=c_short) a(5);
> call foo (a(3))
> end
>
> ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t10\\(%rsp\\), %edi" { target { {
> *-*-linu
> x* *-*-gnu* } && { ! ia32 } } } } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-assembler "movswl\t-14\\(%ebp\\), %eax" { target { {
> *-*-lin
> ux* *-*-gnu* } && { ia32 } } } } }
> ----------
>
> Why does it fail
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler movswl\t10\\(%rsp\\),
> %edi
>
> on arm-linux-gnueabihf?
>
Probably because the "real" target name is expanded to
armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf, so
target { { *-*-linu > x* *-*-gnu* } && { ! ia32 } }
matches
Thanks,
Christophe
> H.J.
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <ci_not...@linaro.org>
> Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 7:26 PM
> Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 7 patches in gcc: 1 regressions on arm
> To: <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
>
>
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es).
> Please find some details below.
>
> In gcc_check master-arm, after:
> | 7 patches in gcc
> | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/102351
> | 97708c5e402 [PATCH v5 7/7] ssa-fre-4.c: Enable for all targets and
> adjust scan match
> | 9c6ba8e5347 [PATCH v5 6/7] scev-cast.c: Enable for all targets and
> adjust scan matches
> | d78236fd00e [PATCH v5 5/7] vect-simd-clone-1[6-8][cd].c: Expect
> in-branch clones for x86
> | a9ef03a445d [PATCH v5 4/7] i386: Adjust apx-ndd.c for frontend
> promotion removal
> | 14ece135ff9 [PATCH v5 3/7] Use incoming small integer argument
> type if possible
> | ... and 2 more patches in gcc
> | ... applied on top of baseline commit:
> | fb64a7b0e1d RISC-V: Add assert for insn operand out of range
> access [PR117878][NFC]
>
> Produces 1 regressions:
> | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
> | FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr112877-1.f90 -O scan-assembler
> movswl\t10\\(%rsp\\), %edi
>
> Used configuration :
> *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
> *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the
> ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure
> and make commands are in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> *
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>
> Current build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/10456/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3116/artifact/artifacts
>
> Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update
> generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the
> master files.
>
>
> --
> H.J.
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
