On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 15:55, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/12/24 9:13 PM, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
> > patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
> > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, 
> > Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain 
> > developer on the usual project channel.
> >
> > We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
> > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI 
> > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
> >
> > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1342 
> > , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have 
> > a fix.
> >
> > In gcc_check master-arm after:
> >
> >    | commit gcc-15-3608-gc5009eb88791
> >    | Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
> >    | Date:   Tue Aug 27 13:15:16 2024 -0400
> >    |
> >    |     libcpp: adjust pedwarn handling
> >    |
> >    |     Using cpp_pedwarning (CPP_W_PEDANTIC instead of if (CPP_PEDANTIC 
> > cpp_error
> >    |     lets users suppress these diagnostics with
> >    |      #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wpedantic".
> >    |
> >    |     This patch changes all instances of the cpp_error (CPP_DL_PEDWARN 
> > to
> >    | ... 44 lines of the commit log omitted.
> >
> > FAIL: 4 regressions
> >
> > regressions.sum:
> >               === g++ tests ===
> >
> > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ...
> > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
> >               === gcc tests ===
> >
> > Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ...
> > FAIL: c-c++-common/pragma-diag-17.c -Wc++-compat  (test for excess errors)
> > ... and 1 more entries
> >
> > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> >   - 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
> > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and 
> > make commands are in
> >   - 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/artifacts/notify/
> > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> >   - 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
> >
> > The configuration of this build is:
> > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
> >
> > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
> > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> >
> > Current build   : 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/artifacts
> > Reference build : 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2696/artifact/artifacts
> >
> > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
> > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c5009eb887910271ea35a857aa68941c7227b9c7/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt
> >
> > Full commit : 
> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c5009eb887910271ea35a857aa68941c7227b9c7
> >
> > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
> > * tcwg_gcc_check
> > ** master-arm
> > *** FAIL: 4 regressions
> > *** 
> > https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c5009eb887910271ea35a857aa68941c7227b9c7/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt
> > *** 
> > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/2697/artifact/artifacts
>
> Curious, does this resolve the problems?
>

Hi,

I think you forgot to attach a patch or a pointer to a patch?

Anyway, these failures do not appear anymore, likely fixed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=49cb7150f0e93e8332f4b78753675b255a5c58f2

Thanks,

Christophe

> _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to