On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 at 00:25, Sam James via Gcc-regression
<gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> ci_not...@linaro.org writes:
>
> > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to
> > your patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any
> > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite
> > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel.
> >
> > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or
> > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our
> > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
> >
> > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1305 
> > , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have 
> > a fix.
> >
> > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:
> >
> >   | commit gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60
> >   | Author: Sam James <s...@gentoo.org>
> >   | Date:   Tue Jul 30 17:10:01 2024 +0100
> >   |
> >   |     testsuite: fix whitespace in dg-do assemble directive
> >   |
> >   |             * gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c: Fix whitespace in dg 
> > directive.
> >
> > FAIL: 3 regressions
> >
> > regressions.sum:
> >               === gcc tests ===
> >
> > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/simd/simd.exp ...
> > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times 
> > \\tsmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1
> > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times 
> > \\tummla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1
> > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times 
> > \\tusmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1
> > [...]
>
> Thanks. The test has been broken since it was added.
>
> Filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116207.

Thanks for checking and letting us know!

Christophe
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to