>>>>> Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> writes:
>> | commit gdb-14-branchpoint-1356-g7737b133640
>> | Author: Tom Tromey <tro...@adacore.com>
>> | Date: Tue Jan 9 11:47:17 2024 -0700
>> |
>> | Handle DW_AT_endianity on enumeration types
>> |
>> | A user found that gdb would not correctly print a field from an Ada
>> | record using the scalar storage order feature. We tracked this down
>> | to a combination of problems.
>> |
>> | First, GCC did not emit DW_AT_endianity on the enumeration type.
>> | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted.
> I see the above failure for both aarch64-linux-gnu and
> arm-linux-gnueabihf in our testing. The log shows ([1]):
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/scalar_storage.exp: print V_LE
> get_compiler_info: gcc-14-0-1
> Any idea what can be causing this?
> This failure happens in CI configurations where we track tip-of-trunk GCC.
This failure is what I would expect if your compiler does not have the
fix. Can you see if your gcc includes this change?
commit 5d8b60effc7268448a94fbbbad923ab6871252cd
Author: Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
Date: Wed Jan 10 13:23:46 2024 +0100
Fix debug info for enumeration types with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order
This implements the support of DW_AT_endianity for enumeration types because
they are scalar and therefore, reverse Scalar_Storage_Order is supported for
them, but only when the -gstrict-dwarf switch is not passed because this is
an extension.
There is an associated GDB patch to be submitted to grok the new DWARF.
thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
