> On Jan 19, 2024, at 17:31, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:15 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi H.J.,
>> 
>> Did the email below made it to your inbox?  I wonder if some of our 
>> precommit CI emails are not reaching developers.
> 
> It has been fixed before the email.

Linaro pre-commit CI sent you below regression report on Jan 10.  Then you 
committed the patch on Jan 18.  Then later on Jan 18 Linaro post-commit CI sent 
you another report.

My question is whether the first report from precommit CI reached your inbox.  
If not, then I'll troubleshoot our email configuration.

Kind regards,

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org


> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> --
>> Maxim Kuvyrkov
>> https://www.linaro.org
>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2024, at 02:24, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
>>> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
>>> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, 
>>> Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain 
>>> developer on the usual project channel.
>>> 
>>> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
>>> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI 
>>> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
>>> 
>>> In gcc_check master-arm after:
>>> 
>>> | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/83662
>>> | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
>>> | Date:   Tue Jan 9 08:46:59 2024 -0800
>>> |
>>> |     hwasan: Check if Intel LAM_U57 is enabled
>>> |
>>> |     When -fsanitize=hwaddress is used, libhwasan will try to enable 
>>> LAM_U57
>>> |     in the startup code.  Update the target check to enable hwaddress 
>>> tests
>>> |     if LAM_U57 is enabled.  Also compile hwaddress tests with -mlam=u57 on
>>> |     x86-64 since hwasan requires LAM_U57 on x86-64.
>>> |
>>> | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted.
>>> | ... applied on top of baseline commit:
>>> | 9f7afa99c67 [committed] Adding missing prototype for __clzhi2 to xstormy 
>>> port
>>> 
>>> FAIL: 8 regressions
>>> 
>>> regressions.sum:
>>> === g++ tests ===
>>> 
>>> Running g++:g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ...
>>> ERROR: can't read "target_hwasan_flags": no such variable
>>> ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP VARNAME target_hwasan_flags
>>> ERROR: tcl error sourcing g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp.
>>> UNRESOLVED: testcase g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp' aborted due to Tcl error
>>> === gcc tests ===
>>> 
>>> Running gcc:gcc.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ...
>>> ... and 6 more entries
>>> 
>>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
>>> - 
>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/
>>>  .
>>> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in
>>> - 
>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/
>>>  .
>>> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
>>> - 
>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
>>>  .
>>> 
>>> The configuration of this build is:
>>> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm
>>> 
>>> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>>> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
>>> 
>>> Current build   : 
>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts
>>> Reference build : 
>>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1542/artifact/artifacts
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> H.J.

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to