Hi Nick, Hi Nathan, I don't see mistakes from CI here. Are you using tip-of-trunk LLVM?
This report was generated for LLVM revision llvmorg-18-init-10263-g1abd8d1a8d96 and linux revision v6.6-rc1-17-g1c6fdbd8f246 . The build log with errors is at [1]. It seems that a later commit in Linux kernel fixed some of the errors in [1], but still with the current linux.git:master 2 errors remain (see [2]): 00:28:15 fs/bcachefs/chardev.c:655:6: error: stack frame size (1032) exceeds limit (1024) in 'bch2_fs_ioctl' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 00:28:15 655 | long bch2_fs_ioctl(struct bch_fs *c, unsigned cmd, void __user *arg) 00:28:15 | ^ 00:28:15 1 error generated. 00:28:15 make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/bcachefs/chardev.o] Error 1 00:29:39 fs/bcachefs/fs-common.c:356:5: error: stack frame size (1128) exceeds limit (1024) in 'bch2_rename_trans' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 00:29:39 356 | int bch2_rename_trans(struct btree_trans *trans, 00:29:39 | ^ 00:29:39 1 error generated. These errors are near-misses, so if you are using a different LLVM revision, they can disappear. [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig-build/110/artifact/artifacts/06-build_linux/console.log.xz [2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig-build/111/artifact/artifacts/06-build_linux/console.log.xz -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Nov 1, 2023, at 21:22, Nathan Chancellor <nat...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 08:54:26AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:42 AM <ci_not...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your >>> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, >>> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, >>> Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain >>> developer on the usual project channel. >>> >>> In CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig after: >> >> ok, so ARCH=arm allmodconfig on mainline... >> >>> >>> | commit v6.6-rc1-17-g1c6fdbd8f246 >>> | Author: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstr...@gmail.com> >>> | Date: Thu Mar 16 22:18:50 2017 -0800 >>> | >>> | bcachefs: Initial commit >>> | >>> | Initially forked from drivers/md/bcache, bcachefs is a new >>> copy-on-write >>> | filesystem with every feature you could possibly want. >>> | >>> | Website: https://bcachefs.org >>> | >>> | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. >>> >>> Results changed to >>> # reset_artifacts: >>> -10 >>> # build_abe binutils: >>> -9 >>> # build_kernel_llvm: >>> -5 >>> # build_abe qemu: >>> -2 >>> # linux_n_obj: >>> 23730 >>> # First few build errors in logs: >>> >>> # 00:23:16 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.h:45:43: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned >>> long long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:17 fs/bcachefs/alloc.c:332:9: error: call to undeclared function >>> 'COUNT_ARGS'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function >>> declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> >> ^ >> $ file fs/bcachefs/alloc.c >> fs/bcachefs/alloc.c: cannot open `fs/bcachefs/alloc.c' (No such file >> or directory) >> >>> # 00:23:17 make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/bcachefs/alloc.o] >>> Error 1 >>> # 00:23:29 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.h:45:43: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned >>> long long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:30 make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/bcachefs/bset.o] >>> Error 1 >> >> ^ >> $ make LLVM=1 ARCH=arm allmodconfig fs/bcachefs/bset.o >> CC [M] fs/bcachefs/bset.o >> $ >> >>> # 00:23:33 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.h:45:43: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned >>> long long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:33 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.h:45:43: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned >>> long long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:33 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.c:67:9: error: array index 0 is past the >>> end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned long >>> long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:33 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.c:120:2: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type '__u64[0]' (aka 'unsigned long >>> long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >>> # 00:23:33 fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.c:201:6: error: array index 0 is past >>> the end of the array (that has type 'const __u64[0]' (aka 'const unsigned >>> long long[0]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds] >> >> $ make LLVM=1 ARCH=arm allmodconfig fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.o >> CC [M] fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.o >> $ >> >> ... what's up with this report? > > I cannot tell exactly from the information in this report but I suspect > ARCH=arm allmodconfig is broken in mainline for other reasons (perhaps > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1953?) and in trying to > uncover that breakage in an automated fashion, it hit this build > breakage and the bisect inadvertently switched to tracking down this > already fixed set of warnings. I think this particular issue is resolved > by Kent's recent array bounds fixes commit: > > https://git.kernel.org/linus/5cfd69775eb5460ef78bb5034a37eb0dc52ab65d > > Cheers, > Nathan > >>> >>> From >>> # reset_artifacts: >>> -10 >>> # build_abe binutils: >>> -9 >>> # build_kernel_llvm: >>> -5 >>> # build_abe qemu: >>> -2 >>> # linux_n_obj: >>> 32815 >>> # linux build successful: >>> all >>> # linux boot successful: >>> boot >>> >>> The configuration of this build is: >>> CI config tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig >>> >>> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- >>> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: >>> >>> Current build : >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig-build/110/artifact/artifacts >>> Reference build : >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig-build/109/artifact/artifacts >>> >>> Reproduce last good and first bad builds: >>> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/linux/sha1/1c6fdbd8f2465ddfb73a01ec620cbf3d14044e1a/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig/reproduction_instructions.txt >>> >>> Full commit : >>> https://git.linaro.org/kernel-org/linux.git/commit/?id=1c6fdbd8f2465ddfb73a01ec620cbf3d14044e1a >>> >>> Latest bug report status : https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1015 >>> >>> List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : >>> * tcwg_kernel >>> ** llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig >>> *** Failure >>> *** >>> https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/linux/sha1/1c6fdbd8f2465ddfb73a01ec620cbf3d14044e1a/tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig/details.txt >>> *** >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--llvm-master-arm-mainline-allmodconfig-build/110/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> ~Nick Desaulniers _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
