> Your patch seems to significantly increase code-size of several benchmarks — 
> by up to 9%.  Would
> you please investigate whether this can be avoided?

Could you, please, confirm if the size increase is due to having bigger
`.eh_frame`/`.debug_frame` sections?

It looks like the reason is generating a bunch of non-sensical unwind info
entries for outlined functions, e.g.:

    000000bc 0000000000000010 000000c0 FDE cie=00000000 
pc=0000000000000c34..0000000000000c3c
      DW_CFA_nop
      DW_CFA_nop
      DW_CFA_nop

I'm working on a patch to not emit .cfi_startproc/.cfi_endproc if a function 
does not contain any CFI instructions.

~chill
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to