Hi, Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> writes: >> Even though memory usage does not increase, I understand the policy of >> wanting to make the data structure simple. >> >> Another way to implement this feature is to use the `addrspace' field >> in `struct mem_attrs' without adding any fields. >> I think that this implementation may be more decent. >> However, since this field holds information specific to the target >> machine, changing this will affect many files. >> > I think your current approach is reasonable. It is better to discuss > your alternate approach upstream. I would suggest you post your patch > upstream and initiate a discussion there. Please refer to > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html (submitting patches part) if you > already haven't.
Thank you very much for your comments and advice. I checked the URL． If there is no objection, I will consider proposing this function(and alternative appraoch) on the GCC mailing list<g...@gcc.gnu.org> (after improving print strings and actual patch files)． Best regards, -- -------------------------------------- Masaki Arai _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
