Hi Dan,

On 10 August 2016 at 15:39, Dan Handley <dan.hand...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Yvan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yvan Roux [mailto:yvan.r...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 09 August 2016 12:06
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On 9 August 2016 at 11:04, Dan Handley <dan.hand...@arm.com> wrote:
> ...
>> > I'm concerned that this bug may appear in the upcoming Linaro GCC 6
>> stable release, which may have a significant lifetime. Can anyone
>> comment on the binutils version to be used in the Linaro GCC 6 release?
>> If a binutils version containing the bug is used, is it possible for
>> this to be patched with the fix? I need to know whether we need to
>> provide an interim solution in ARM Trusted Firmware.
>>
>> Linaro GCC 6 release will use Linaro BInutils 2.26 branch which is based
>> on FSF 2.26 branch + some backports from mainline.  Thus, our branch
>> will indeed need to have this fix backported to avoid this issue.  I
>> don't see any blocker to do it, but will let people in charge of our
>> Binutils and Binariy releases to comment on the feasability before the
>> coming release.
>>
> Thanks for confirming the binutils version. I hope a fix is feasible. I'll 
> wait for others to comment.

The fix is in our Binutils 2.26 branch now, so the coming release
should be fine.

Yvan

>> Thanks for the heads up
> You're welcome
>
> Dan.
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the 
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the 
> information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to