On 3 June 2016 at 21:02, Rui Ueyama <r...@google.com> wrote: >> Is the LLD community in agreement that a few core developers can and >> will continue to block contributions, while doing all the work >> themselves until such a day that it's deemed ready by the same >> developers, in which time that everyone else will then, be allowed to >> collaborate? > > > No, and I think I've never blocked any contributions for such reason. I > apologize I didn't review Adhemerval patch. My knowledge of AArch64 and TLS > optimizations is limited, and since Rafael (who knows most about relocation > handling in LLD) was reviewing it, I deferred it to him. I'll try to review > it next time. > >> >> Or is the community in disagreement with Rafael's behaviour and will >> try to not only curb it, but openly and actively promote more >> collaboration by allowing other people to participate in the design >> and implementation of their own targets? > > > Yes, including the part that Rafael should have done this differently. > > Rafael, I think you want to slow down a little bit and take more time on > getting consensus on commits, even for things that you think "too obvious". > Code review for LLD is usually fast, and overall it would make the > development even faster because of smooth communication between > collaborators.
Rui, Thank you very much for your response. I'm relieved that I had not made the wrong decision about LLD some years back, and I really appreciate the work you have being putting on it. Looking forward to more collaborations in the present and future! cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
