On 19 January 2016 at 18:04, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org> wrote: > I do see some x86_64 specialized implementation being used currently > (sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_{sin,cos}f.S for instance). The sincos implementations > is still used (sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sincosf.S). > > What you referring that glibc has dropped is the utilization of the > fsin/fcos/fsincos Intel instructions, which shows a ridiculous error > range depending of the inputs [1].
The sincos implementation for x86_64 is the generic one; it is the sincosf (single float) that has an assembly implementation. However you're right otherwise; I had overlooked everything but the ieee754 double implementations of the transcendentals. Siddhesh _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain