On 19 January 2016 at 18:04, Adhemerval Zanella
<adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org> wrote:
> I do see some x86_64 specialized implementation being used currently
> (sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_{sin,cos}f.S for instance). The sincos implementations
> is still used (sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sincosf.S).
>
> What you referring that glibc has dropped is the utilization of the
> fsin/fcos/fsincos Intel instructions, which shows a ridiculous error
> range depending of the inputs [1].

The sincos implementation for x86_64 is the generic one; it is the
sincosf (single float) that has an assembly implementation.  However
you're right otherwise; I had overlooked everything but the ieee754
double implementations of the transcendentals.

Siddhesh
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to