JIT like lua might also not work because you need to rewrite OVS to support it. I don't think that it will be accepted.
And it looks like it's problem in OVS, not in ODP. I.e. OVS should allow to use library functions for fast path (where inlines are critical). I.e. not just call odp_packet_len(), but move hole OVS function to dynamic library. regards, Maxim. On 10 November 2015 at 02:50, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote: > Adding Grant Likely to this chain as it relates to the broader subject of > portable ABIs that we've been discussing. > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Bill Fischofer >> <bill.fischo...@linaro.org> wrote: >> > The IO Visor project appears to be doing something like this with LLVM >> and >> > JIT constructs to dynamically insert code into the kernel in a >> > platform-independent manner. Perhaps we can leverage that technology? >> >> GCC has some experimental JIT support, but I think it would be a lot >> of work to use it, and I don't know how stable it is. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT >> The LLVM support is probably more advanced. >> >> Jim >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > lng-...@lists.linaro.org > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > >
_______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
