On 2 October 2015 at 18:04, Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 2, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >> >> == Progress == >> 2 days off (4/10) >> >> * Infrastructure/validation: (3/10) >> further checking of cross-testing results stability on aarch64-linux >> - found a workaround for a timestamp problem (_Pragma3 testcase) > > contrib/gcc_update --touch is the best way to fix the above issue.
Yes, that's what I added to abe. > >> - looked at c11-atomic-exec-5 whose execution time ranges between 1s >> and 1h :-) > > I even seeing that on thunderx. > Thanks for the confirmation, I saw your comment on bugzilla. I understood you thought it was a HW problem with your platform. Since we see it on different HW, it could mean there is an implementation problem in libatomic? >> - forcing make check to -j8 seems to work well, will work on a nicer >> improvement >> >> * reported and briefly looked at failure in a new libstdc++ test >> (directory_iterator) on armv5t >> >> * Misc (conf calls, meetings, emails, ....) (2/10) >> >> * Internal (1/10) >> - GNU linker patch review >> _______________________________________________ >> linaro-toolchain mailing list >> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
