On 11 December 2014 at 14:36, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.deche...@linaro.org> wrote: > and it's quite consistent over multiple runs. So it's much more than > 40% actually.. if we apply these ratios we get theoretical numbers > that makes more sense... the ifc6410 should definitely be faster than > panda..
Nice! So, we can do this in two stages: first, we move the bus clock all the way up. Test. Then we move the CPU clock one step at a time. Test. Rinse, repeat. We should find a comfortable and performing level somewhere between 1.2 and 1.5 GHz. cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
