On May 24, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have tried out a prototype of using binfmt_misc, and it does not appear to 
> be a worthwhile solution at this point.
> 
> Bottom line: with a nice fast multi-core x86 server and a pool of ARM boards 
> we can test GCC in ~20min.
> 
> Testing setup:
> - Core i3 2-core host
> - Chromebook 2-core target, SSD disk
> - WiFi network
> - GCC mainline built from sources with same flags both natively and cross: C, 
> C++, Fortran.
> 
> General observations about testing ARM toolchains:
> 
> - When testing natively target is busy 100%: around 50% of time is spent 
> compiling testcases, 40-45% in dejagnu/expect, 5-10% on actual test 
> execution.  Target is the bottleneck.
>  -- 21633.22user 4400.13system 4:13:11elapsed
> 
> - With testing cross using standard rsh_prog=ssh, rcp_prog=scp, target is 
> busy 40% of the time: 30% on ssh, 10% on actual test execution.  Host is the 
> bottleneck.
>  -- 
  -- 9093.65user 2574.72system 1:14:28elapsed

> 
> - When testing cross (using method below) target is busy only 15-20% of the 
> time: 10% on ssh and 10% on actual test execution.  Host is the bottleneck.
>  -- 9490.16user 2882.54system 1:10:57elapsed
> 


--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org


_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to