Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org> writes:

> Michael,
>
> There are two things here:
>  1. Enabling Go for AArch64 in GCC upstream
>  2. Supporting it in the Toolchain Working Group releases.
>
> For 1 please post your patches to this list for initial review along
> with testsuite results.

Already done -- that libatomic patch is it!  I'll get the testsuite
running today.

> Once we are happy you are not making any obvious mistakes you can post
> to the gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org list, and submit upstream.
>
> For 2 we need to go through TSC to get some changes to present cards.
> I am assuming this is coming from LEG?  Can you send Kate Stewart,
> James Elliott, Andrea, Anmar & me an email detailing what you think
> you want in terms of support?

Yes, that's a good question.  I'll get back to you :)

Would you be prepared to ship something that had "experimental,
unsupported, if it breaks you lose" written all over it, or would you
rather only ship things that you are willing to support?

Cheers,
mwh

> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> On 2 October 2013 03:44, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the patch I just sent to this list in place, gccgo builds for
>> aarch64.  I don't know how well it _works_ -- "hello world" builds and
>> runs -- but I would like to ask what the process would be to get gccgo
>> included in the binary distributions of GCC that Linaro makes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> mwh
>
>
>
> -- 
> Matthew Gretton-Dann
> Linaro Toolchain Working Group
> matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to