On 28 August 2013 18:17, pavan p m <pm.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Renato, Yes, i wanted to cross-compile from x86_64 to ARM. More > specifically, I needed to do it for the cortex m0 processor. > My eventual goal would be to tweak a certain part of the instruction > scheduler specific to the project I am working on. So I am thinking if it > is possible using LLVM. >
This is most definitely possible! ;) I saw that there is support for cortex-a9 onwards, but am not sure, if > there is any support for cortex m series. > There is support for M0, you just have to specify "-target thumbv6m -mcpu=cortex-m0" and you should be good to go. Because LLVM is inherently a cross-compiler, you can only specify a CPU when using the right back-end, and you do so by specifying the "-target". I agree this is confusing and I intend to map all confusing things when cross-compiling, so if you do find weird behaviour, be sure to send my way. In that case, I would have implement a backend which would support this > particular board. This seems to be a long shot, but would you provide your > opinion if this is possible at all? If not, then what would be the proper > approach? > You don't need to implement the back-end, only the pass you want. I'm not sure how easy it is to plugin a new scheduler, as the LLVM scheduler is a bit of a mess, but you could try by changing the current scheduler(s). A few documents that you can find interesting, some of which you seem to have read already: http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html cheers, --renato
_______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
