On 15 August 2012 09:56, Michael Hope <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15 August 2012 00:45, Matthew Gretton-Dann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So looking at the logs this seems to be a transient data transfer error:
>>
>> The logs 
>> (http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild358-tcpanda02-armv5r2/toplevel.txt)
>> have:
>>
>> make[4]: Entering directory `/scratch/cbuild/slave/slaves/tcpanda02'
>> make -s -f ../../lib/fetch.mk
>> gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar-spawn 2>&1 | grep -v
>> '^make\['
>> Trying 
>> http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.xz
>> Trying 
>> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.xz
>> Trying 
>> http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.xz
>> Trying http://ex.seabright.co.nz/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.xz
>> Trying 
>> http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.bz2
>> Trying 
>> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.bz2
>> Trying 
>> http://builds.linaro.org/toolchain/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.bz2
>> Trying http://ex.seabright.co.nz/snapshots/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.bz2
>> bunzip2: gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08.tar.bz2: data
>> integrity (CRC) error in data
>
> Not sure here.  ex.seabright is the authoritative source.  Perhaps
> there was a fault with the proxy in the control lab?
>
> The good news is that the test fired and the build failed early.  I've
> logged LP: #1036867 to see if it happens again.
>
>> The x86_64 build has succeeded OK though, so I (well Ramana really)
>> have, eventually, restarted that build.  We did encounter some issues
>> with restarting the build as follows:
>>
>>  1) My Launchpad ID doesn't have permissions to spawn jobs through the
>> web interface at ex.seabright.co.nz
>
> Fixed.
>
>>  2) So I attempted to spawn the job manually as follows:
>>
>>     $ ssh -p7023 [email protected] ./cbuild/tools/spawn.sh
>> gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08 armv5-builder
>>     Spawning gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08 into the queue benchmarks
>>     Spawned into a9-builder
>>
>>     This wasn't exactly what I expected.  What are the correct runes
>> here to get a build?
>
> Spawn picks the closest spawn class based on the filename or, if
> supplied, the second argument.  Here you supplied 'armv5...' which is
> closest to 'benchmarks'.
>
> What you want is to click 'Release' beside the job name in the
> scheduler view, to respawn through the /spawn interface, or to touch
> the .job file in cbuild@orion:~/queue/armv5-builder.
>
>>     I've left this job in place as I've probably done enough damage 
>> already...
>>
>>  3) Ramana then attempted to use the web-interface at
>> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/recent to get the job to rebuild
>> (http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/scheduler/spawn?queue=armv7l&job=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08).
>>  However, this results in a Python exception.
>
> Real men don't use user-friendly argument checking :)  Well, not on
> hacks like this tool.  There is no armv7l queue so an assert fired.
>
>>  4) Finally we used Ramana's credentials on the spawn interface, and
>> that seems to have spawned the rebuild correctly.
>
> Good.
>
>> I'll let this run and see what happens.
>>
>> Michael, can you just check that things are progressing properly
>> please, and also give me appropriate permissions on the web interface?
>
> Checking:
>  http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012
>
> shows that the build finished on x86_64 and i686.  Checking /scheduler
> shows that ARM builds are in progress on a9hf, a9, and armv5.  Most
> are in the testsuite and have ~6 hours to go.

Results are still coming in.  Here's some of the diffs:

a9hf:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild358-ursa2-cortexa9hfr1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07
 Changes are due to upstream test suite whilespace changes only

x86_64:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild358-oort1-x86_64r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07
 No change

i686:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.08/logs/i686-precise-cbuild358-oort2-i686r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07
 No change

For 4.6:
 http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08

x86_64:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08/logs/x86_64-precise-cbuild358-oort1-x86_64r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.07
 No change

i686:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08/logs/i686-precise-cbuild358-oort2-i686r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.07

a9:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild358-tcpanda04-cortexa9r1/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.07

armv5:
 
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild358-tcpanda05-armv5r2/gcc-testsuite.txt?base=gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.07

-- Michael

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to