On 16 July 2012 13:51, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: > We've just started running a weekly benchmark of GCC trunk and Linaro > GCC tip. I've written a short script that compares against a baseline > and spits out a graph: > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn.png > http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr.png > > I'll switch the baseline to GCC 4.7.0 once the build and benchmark run > completes. The gcc-linaro results need more data before they'll make > sense. > > Part way there. An automatic email would be next. We should check > the graphs before each performance call.
The 4.7.0 baseline is done and the graph now has enough data points to show something: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn.png I've extended the testsuite diff to also make benchmark diffs like: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn188808/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild340-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1/benchmarks-diff.txt and http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-4.8~svn189410/logs/armv7l-precise-cbuild344-ursa3-cortexa9hfr1/benchmarks-diff.txt This suggests that the dip in SPECINT around svn188808 was largely due to mcf and largely corrected by the next run. Some good stuff happened between svn189410 and svn189575. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
