On Wednesday 11 April 2012 11:25:55 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Probably beating a dead cow, but, the major problem with sysroots > would be the triplet name? > > E.g, in any architecture: > > /arm-linux-gnueabi/sysroot-contents-here
it isn't really about having a sysroot the toolchain can find. that already works today for any target or multilib or isa or soft/hard float or arch or <anything>. the issue is having an ldso in its canonical path for runtime usage. i don't think anyone wants hardcoded tuple dirs in the root. some people can't even handle /bin or /sbin or /lib, so i'm afraid this proposal would cause them to implode ;). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
