On 8 March 2012 10:13, Ken Werner <ken.wer...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 02/27/2012 10:12 PM, Michael Hope wrote: >> >> Hi Ken, Thiago. Could you try your hand at writing cards for the >> OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer and GDB and Android? Here are some past >> cards: >> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-GCC-O3 >> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-OPENOCD-SUPPORT >> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-WINDOWS-TOOLCHAIN >> >> They cover: >> * An introduction >> * The why/advantages >> * The what/features >> * The how/steps >> * Dependencies >> * Acceptance criteria (which is a post-tense version of the body) >> >> A card should cover three calendar months. Check the unknowns - we >> need to investigate the acceptance criteria and make sure there is no >> unexpected side work in there. >> >> We use roadmap cards as the highest level of organising our work. >> Cards are the interface between working groups and the TSC and sit at >> the project brief / deep but concise level. >> >> Draft them on the wiki (cf https://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox) >> and we'll go from there. >> >> -- Michael > > > Hi, > > I've merge in the existent card of David R. and created an initial version > for the OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer card at: > https://wiki.linaro.org/KenWerner/Sandbox/OEMetaLinaroCard
Ta. I've edited and flattened. Tell me what you think. > For CI purposes I think we should invest on getting recipes that fetch the > components directly from their repositories rather than downloading > tarballs. Agreed. CI is after manual-run-for-monthy-release though. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
