On 19 September 2011 00:48, Michael K. Edwards <m.k.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please coordinate with Jon Masters at RedHat/Fedora and Adam Conrad at > Ubuntu/Debian on this. (Cc'ing the cross-distro list, through which the > recent ARM summit at Linux Plumbers was organized.)
OK, let me summarise for the new people on the cc. I'm looking to adding a few ARM optimised string routines to eglibc (memchr initially) and they requires ARMv6t2 and newer, hence I started looking at how it finds architecture specific code. At the moment eglibc uses the architecture from the 1st part of the triplet as part of the search path in the source tree, so configuring for armv5-linux-gnueabi will end up looking in an arm/eabi/armv5 directory. What I was going to do (after some discussion with Joseph Myers: http://old.nabble.com/-ARM--architecture-specific-subdirectories,-optimised-memchr-and-some-questions-td32070289.html ) 1) Add armv6/v7 to config.sub 2) If the version wasn't specified in the 1st part of a triplet, then use gcc ifdef's to autodetect what we're building for 3) If the version was specified in the triplet then use it A bit of digging however led me to find that neither gcc or binutils seem to use the version in the triplet to determine anything, and the discussion on the linaro-toolchain list that started this thread have come to the conclusion that people would actually prefer to always ignore the triplet (like binutils and gcc) and just autodetect from gcc ifdef's. Thoughts? Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
