Hello, > - Is SMS arch-specific, or is this implementation in particular > ARM-specific?
SMS and the GCC implementation are not arch-specific. In general, SMS should be beneficial when applied on in-order machines (or machines with limited OOO capabilities). > > - What's the expected benefit out of this? Is it a vague "should > make things a bit faster" or are there indications that it is a > significant win for certain scenarios? It is not always beneficial to turn on SMS as it increases code size and can increase register pressure. I'm looking for those cases where the register pressure increases so we could construct a cost model based on it. Due to the fact there is currently no memory dependence analysis in the phase that SMS is applied (Richard Sandifrod is working on this); we have seen in the past that it is beneficial for loops with no read/write dependency as for loops with the later we are conservative when constructing the dependencies between instructions which eventually limits the algorithm. So in the past we have seen that kernels with simple accumulator showed improvements with SMS. Thanks, Revital > > Thanks, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP > Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 > Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
