On 5 September 2011 17:40, Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:21:49PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: >> memchr is good. memset could be better for blocks of less than 1k. >> strchr gets second place but is eclipsed by newlib's version. strcmp >> need work. strcmp is good. > > It's strcpy which is good in this last sentence, though it basically > matches newlib's version.
I think that's because it IS newlib's version - I've not done a strcpy. > I'm curious about the "political" side of cortexstrings -- is there > active interest by the library maintainers in picking up our versions? There is interest from partners in having optimised versions; I think the library maintainers are happy to take it if you can convince them that they are improvements. Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
