On 5 May 2011 18:19, Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 05/05/11 16:22, Martin Pool wrote:
>>
>> I filed<https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-rewrite/+bug/777920>  to track
>> this.  I think it will have been improved a fair bit by John's recent
>> work on huge-tree workingtree performance work (which sped up some
>> things like revert 8x) but there's probably more to do.  That work is
>> in bzr 2.4beta, which you can get from eg ppa:bzr/daily.
>
> I certainly have witnessed revert being very slow.
>
> In fact, I'd say it feels quicker to run "bzr st" and then do "bzr revert"
> naming individual files. Maybe that's illusory, but it's certainly quicker
> to revert individual files if you already have the list to hand. Of course,
> that doesn't revert merge notes, so it's perhaps not exactly the same.

I think that's consistent with the bug that was recently fixed.  If
you still see this in current bzr 2.4beta, please let me know.

> Uncommit is another command that seems unreasonably slow. It really
> shouldn't be that hard to do a "patch -R" and update some metadata
> somewhere, but clearly there's a lot more to it than that!

I think that's the same.

Martin

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to