On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:00:18PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > 2011/4/27 Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > If we do have to do something in the callers rather than in do_div() the > > annotation seems substantially more taseful than inserting a random asm > > into the code. > I agree. for this patch which will not be applied, people can just get > information about how to workaround the gcc issue while they have the > same problem. google can find there are other people who failed to > compile wm8974 module too. eg. > http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/30/%23ubuntu-arm.txt > Andrew Stubbs, Michael Hope in Linaro's toolchain team are working > hard on this gcc issue. there have been many update today: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783 Is this just some Linaro toolchain that has the issue rather than a vanilla GCC release? If so and they fix the compiler bug it doesn't seem terribly useful to bodge it in mainline. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
