SPEC
  Tried to track down what was going on with lbm; it doesn't seem to
be repeatable on canis1; I'd previously seen it fail at O1 and work at
O0 and tried to chop down the flags between the two; but after adding
all the flags back in on top of -O0 it still worked and then I tried
-O1 again and it worked.   Going to try on another machine, but it
might be uninitialised data somewhere.

Panda
  Our panda arrived; it's now happily nestling near our Beagles and
running the 0126 headless snapshot (with 0127 hwpack).  It seems fine
except
for rather slow USB and SD IO.  Tip: Panda's do absolutely nothing (no
LEDs, no serial console activity) unless you put an SD card
in with the firmware on.

Libffi
  Wrote the changes for armhf.  Tested on arm, armhf, i386, ppc and
s390x - all happy.  (Not too unsuspectingly variadic calls just work
on everything other than armhf without the api change)
  Mailed Python CType list asking how much of a pain the API change
will be and any hints on what might be affected.
  Awaiting sign off for submission of code.

Optimised library routines
  Looked at benchmarking 'git'; I'd seen previous discussions where it
had been pointed out that it spends a lot of time in library routines;
and indeed it does spend useful
amounts in memchr, memcpy and friends on a simple  git diff v2.6.36
v.2.6.37 > /dev/null of the current kernel tree produces a useful
~25second run.
  One interesting observation is that the variation in the times
reported by 'time' - i.e. user, system and real, the variation in
user+system is much less than either user or
system individually and is quite stable (within ~0.7% over 10 runs).
  I've just tried preloading my memchr routine in and it does get a
consistent 1-1.2% improvement which does look above the nice.
  Also asked on libc-help list for suggestions as to other benchmarks
people actually trust to reflect useful performance increases in core
routines as opposed to totally
artificial ones.

Dave

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to