On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > Some news from the qemu mailing list that I think might be > of interest to gcc folks here: > > Christophe Lyon from ST has kindly released a large > set of test cases of Neon intrinsics: > http://gitorious.org/arm-neon-tests/arm-neon-tests > (the tests themselves are more aimed at testing qemu, > so they just produce output to be compared against a > reference generated from running on hardware). > > However they don't currently compile with gcc (but > are ok with armcc). From the README: > > # The tests currently fail to build with GCC/ARM: > # - no support for Neon_Overflow/fpsrc register > # - ICE when compiling ref_vldX.c, ref_vldX_lane.c, ref_vstX_lane.c
gcc-linaro-2011.01 no longer ICEs. > # - fails to compile vst1_lane.c The particular error is: In file included from ref_vst1_lane.c:27:0: .../4.5.2/include/arm_neon.h: In function 'exec_vst1_lane': .../4.5.2/include/arm_neon.h:8424:33: error: argument must be a constant .../4.5.2/include/arm_neon.h:8448:33: error: argument must be a constant A bit of bisection shows that these two lines: TEST_VST1_LANE(q, int, s, 8, 16, 15); TEST_VST1_LANE(q, uint, u, 8, 16, 10); are the cause. The other, similar lines are fine. > # - missing include files: dspfns.h, armdsp.h dspfns.h is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/625256 armdsp.h isn't tracked anywhere. Both of these are ARM specific and we should talk about it on Monday. > Maybe it's worth somebody having a look at this, > at least enough to find out whether the ICEs are > things we already know about or have perhaps > already fixed in linaro gcc? Richard Sandiford, could you have a look at the vst1_lane faults? -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
