On 10/05/2010 06:35 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> From the minutes:
> 
> |     * ARM wish to keep rights for anything ARM produces, perhaps 
> |       through back grant
> |     * Future code will be done by Linaro, so by others
> |     * Issue is with copyright instead of license
> |     * MIT/X11 does allow relicensing
> |     * ACTION: Does BSD allow relicensing?
> |     * GLIBC is a interesting case
> |          + GLIBC prefers copyright assignment to FSF and re-licensing
> |            under the LGPL
> |          + This assignment may inhibit Linaro from re-granting back to 
> |            ARM
> 
> Isn't the FSF copyright assignment non exclusive, i.e. the original 
> copyright holder still keeps a right to do anything with his own copy?

I put on the audio of this conference call in the background today,
because intellectual property is a topic that interests/infuriates me.
If I understood the current situation correctly, the principle point of
contention relates to the FSF's position on patents, which translates
into "ARM's lawyers will not sign the standard FSF assignment."

During this part of the discussion, it was revealed that the existing
assignment agreements for GCC and GDB involve confidential terms which
address those problems. They have not worked out such details for GLIBC.
Personally, I am intensely curious about those exact terms, though we
are unlikely to ever discover the details.

Thus, there exist assignment issues that go beyond simple copyrights.
Speculatively, I believe the wording of the FSF assignment basically
requires all patents to be assigned along with the copyrights. If you
think about the wording of the GNU licenses, that language appears to be
strictly necessary for the FSF. Simultaneously, that would give good
reason for ARM's lawyers to be recalcitrant. Or so I imagine.

I am eager to see how this soap opera gets resolved, but it will be
entirely anticlimactic if more undisclosed terms cut through the red tape.

-- 
Zach Welch
CodeSourcery
zwe...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x743

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to