It's only part of the puzzle, but I run speed benchmarks as part of the continious build: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/benchcompare http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.5-2010.09-1/logs/armv7l-maverick-cbuild4-pavo4/pybench-test.txt
I've just modified this to build different variants as well. ffmpeg now builds as supplied (-O2 and others), with -Os, with hand-written assembler turned off, and with -mfpu=neon. corebench builds in -O2 and -Os. This might be one way to approach things. It's simple to add other programs into the mix. -- Michael On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> wrote: > It would be interesting if we could get a good, representative set of > comparative benchmarks for the size and performance impact of -Os. > > I did a bit of investigation here: > > https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/OptimiseForSize > > (though with just a few packages and only one benchmark, it's not very > comprehensive) > > Cheers > ---Dave > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-toolchain mailing list > linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
